एक त्रुटि हुई. विवरण छिपाओ
आप के पेज सहेजे नहीं गए है. नवीकरण करें रद्द करें

Ghana

  • President:Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  • Vice President:Mahamudu Bawumia
  • Capital city:Accra
  • Languages:Asante 16%, Ewe 14%, Fante 11.6%, Boron (Brong) 4.9%, Dagomba 4.4%, Dangme 4.2%, Dagarte (Dagaba) 3.9%, Kokomba 3.5%, Akyem 3.2%, Ga 3.1%, other 31.2% note: English is the official language (2010 est.)
  • Government
  • National statistics office
  • Population, persons:2,97,67,108 (2018)
  • Area, sq km:2,27,540
  • GDP per capita, US$:2,202 (2018)
  • GDP, billion current US$:65.6 (2018)
  • GINI index:No data
  • Ease of Doing Business rank:114
All datasets:  A E F I M N S T U W
  • A
    • जुलाई 2019
      Source: World Bank
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 22 अगस्त, 2019
      Select Dataset
      The primary World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially-recognized international sources. It presents the most current and accurate global development data available, and includes national, regional and global estimates
    • सितम्बर 2019
      Source: Food and Agriculture Organization
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 04 सितम्बर, 2019
      Select Dataset
      AQUASTAT is FAO's global information system on water and agriculture, developed by the Land and Water Division. The main mandate of the program is to collect, analyze and disseminate information on water resources, water uses, and agricultural water management with an emphasis on countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. This allows interested users to find comprehensive and regularly updated information at global, regional, and national levels.
    • जनवरी 2014
      Source: World Resources Institute
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 07 दिसम्बर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      This dataset shows countries and river basins' average exposure to five of Aqueduct's water risk indicators: baseline water stress, interannual variability, seasonal variability, flood occurrence, and drought severity. Risk exposure scores are available for every country (except Greenland and Antarctica), the 100 most populous river basins, and the 100 largest river basins by area. Scores are also available for all industrial, agricultural, and domestic users' average exposure to each indicator in each country and river basin. Citation: Gassert, F., P. Reig, T. Luo, and A. Maddocks. 2013. “Aqueduct country and river basin rankings: a weighted aggregation of spatially distinct hydrological indicators.” Working paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, November 2013. Available online at http://wri.org/publication/aqueduct-country-river-basin-rankings.
    • अगस्त 2015
      Source: World Resources Institute
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 25 मार्च, 2019
      Select Dataset
      Suggested citation: Luo, T., R. Young, and P. Reig. 2015. "Aqueduct projected water stress rankings." Technical note. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, August 215. Available online at http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-projected-water-stress-country-rankings.    Supplemental Materials: Country Scores                         WRI projected future country-level water stress for 2020, 2030, and 2040 under business-as-usual (BAU), optimistic, and pessimistic scenarios. Each tab lists country projected water stress scores for each scenario and year, weighted by overall water withdrawals. Scores weighted by individual sectors (agricultural, domestic, and industrial) are provided as well.   These global projections are best suited to making comparisons among countries for the same year and among scenarios and decades for the same region. More detailed and localized data or scenarios can better estimate potential outcomes for specific regions and expose large sub-national variations that are subsumed under countrywide water-stress values. The country indicators face persistent limitations in attempting to simplify complex information, such as spatial and temporal variations, into a single number. They also do not account for the governance and investment structure of the water sector in different countries.    It is important to note the inherent uncertainty in estimating any future conditions, particularly those associated with climate change, future population and economic trends, and water demand. Additionally, care should be taken when examining the change rates of a country’s projected stress levels between one year and another, because the risk-score thresholds are not linear. For more information on these limitations, see the technical note.   Projections are described in further detail in: Luck, M., M. Landis, and F. Gassert, “Aqueduct Water Stress Projections: Decadal Projections of Water Supply and Demand Using CMIP5 GCMs,” Technical note (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, April 2015), http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-water-stress-projections.   Water Stress withdrawals / available flow Water stress measures total annual water withdrawals (municipal, industrial, and agricultural) expressed as a percentage of the total annual available blue water. Higher values indicate more competition among users. Score Value [0-1) Low (<10%) [1-2) Low to medium (10-20%) [2-3) Medium to high (20-40%) [3-4) High (40-80%) [4-5] Extremely high (>80%)    
    • अप्रैल 2018
      Source: National Institute of Statistics and Demographics, Burkina Faso
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 07 फरवरी, 2019
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: https://burkinafaso.opendataforafrica.org/iivyjsg Source: Integrated Water Resources Management Program Area of Watersheds in Burkina Faso (in km2)
  • E
    • अक्तूबर 2019
      Source: International Labour Organization
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 15 अक्तूबर, 2019
      Select Dataset
      The employed comprise all persons of working age who, during a specified brief period, were in the following categories: a) paid employment (whether at work or with a job but not at work); or b) self-employment (whether at work or with an enterprise but not at work). Data are disaggregated by economic activity according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Economic activity refers to the main activity of the establishment in which a person worked during the reference period and does not depend on the specific duties or functions of the person's job, but on the characteristics of the economic unit in which this person works.
  • F
    • जुलाई 2015
      Source: African Development Bank Group
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 06 अगस्त, 2015
      Select Dataset
      The AfDB Statistics Department and the Fragile States Unit have compiled this data set from various sources (the World Bank, WHO, IMF, and many others)
  • I
    • अक्तूबर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 27 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: International virtual water flow statistics  Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/international-virtual-water-flow-statistics/ Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) The water footprint of humanity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
  • M
    • मार्च 2019
      Source: World Bank
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 20 मार्च, 2019
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The World Bank https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/ Topic: Millennium Development Goals Publication: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/millennium-development-goals License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/   Relevant indicators drawn from the World Development Indicators, reorganized according to the goals and targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs focus the efforts of the world community on achieving significant, measurable improvements in people's lives by the year 2015: they establish targets and yardsticks for measuring development results. Gender Parity Index (GPI)= Value of indicator for Girls/ Value of indicator for Boys. For e.g GPI=School enrolment for Girls/School enrolment for Boys. A value of less than one indicates differences in favor of boys, whereas a value near one (1) indicates that parity has been more or less achieved. The greater the deviation from 1 greater the disparity is.
  • N
    • अगस्त 2019
      Source: African Development Bank Group
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 16 अगस्त, 2019
      Select Dataset
      3The Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic (AICD) was an unprecedented knowledge program on Africa’s infrastructure that grew out of the pledge by the G8 Summit of 2005 at Gleneagles to substantially increase ODA assistance to Africa, particularly to the infrastructure sector, and the subsequent formation of the Infrastructure Consortium for Africa (ICA). The AICD study was founded on the recognition that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) suffers from a very weak infrastructural base, and that this is a key factor in the SSA region failing to realize its full potential for economic growth, international trade, and poverty reduction. The study broke new ground, with primary data collection efforts covering network service infrastructures (ICT, power, water & sanitation, road transport, rail transport, sea transport, and air transport) from 2001 to 2006 in 24 selected African countries. Between them, these countries account for 85 percent of the sub-Saharan Africa population, GDP, and infrastructure inflows. The countries included in the initial study were: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Senegal, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. The study also represents an unprecedented effort to collect detailed economic and technical data on African infrastructure in relation to the fiscal costs of each of the sectors, future sector investment needs, and sector performance indicators. As a result, it has been possible for the first time to portray the magnitude of the continent’s infrastructure challenges and to provide detailed and substantiated estimates on spending needs, funding gaps, and the potential efficiency dividends to be derived from policy reforms.
    • अक्तूबर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 26 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: National water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/national-water-footprint-statistics/ Water footprints of national consumption (1996-2005) Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) 'The water footprint of humanity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237. Water footprints of national production (1996-2005) Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) 'The water footprint of humanity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
  • S
    • सितम्बर 2019
      Source: Social Progress Imperative
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 14 अक्तूबर, 2019
      Select Dataset
        Data cited at: Social Progress Index https://www.socialprogress.org/download The Social Progress Index is a new way to define the success of our societies. It is a comprehensive measure of real quality of life, independent of economic indicators. The Social Progress Index is designed to complement, rather than replace, economic measures such as GDP. Each year, Social Progress Imperative conducts a comprehensive review of all indicators included in the Social Progress Index framework to check data updates (which frequently include retroactive revisions) and whether new indicators have been published that are well-suited to describing social progress concepts. Such a review necessitates a recalculation of previously published versions of the Social Progress Index, as any removal or additions of indicators to the framework or changes due to retroactive revisions in data from the original data sources prevent comparability between previously published versions of the Social Progress Index and the 2019 Social Progress Index. Therefore, using the 2019 Social Progress Index framework and methodology, we provide comparable historical data for additional five years of the Social Progress Index, from 2014 to 2018.
    • अगस्त 2013
      Source: Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 02 फरवरी, 2016
      Select Dataset
      This dataset provides data on literacy rates, primary and secondary school attendance rates access to improved water and sanitation, household access to electricity, and household ownership of radio and television. Unlike other datasets, notably the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI), this dataset provides data at the subnational level, specifically the first administrative district level. Furthermore, the data is comparable both within and across countries. This subnational level of data allows for assessment of education and household characteristics at a more relevant level for allocation of resources and targeting development interventions.
    • अप्रैल 2019
      Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 12 अप्रैल, 2019
      Select Dataset
    • जून 2019
      Source: Sustainable Development Solutions Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 09 जुलाई, 2019
      Select Dataset
      Data Cited at - Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. (2019): Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). The 2019 SDG Index and Dashboards report presents a revised and updated assessment of countries’ distance to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It includes detailed SDG Dashboards to help identify implementation priorities for the SDGs. The report also provides a ranking of countries by the aggregate SDG Index of overall performance.
  • T
    • जुलाई 2019
      Source: International Benchmarking Network for Water and Sanitation Utilities
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 06 सितम्बर, 2019
      Select Dataset
    • फरवरी 2015
      Source: University of Keele
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 24 अप्रैल, 2015
      Select Dataset
      This water poverty index is a first pass at trying to establish an international measure comparing performance in the water sector across countries in a holistic way that brings in the diverse aspects and issues that are relevant. It does seem to give some sensible results but it does not pretend to be definitive nor offer a totally accurate measure of the situation.
  • U
    • सितम्बर 2018
      Source: United Nations Environment Programme
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 22 अक्तूबर, 2018
      Select Dataset
    • जुलाई 2017
      Source: United Nations Children's Fund
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 23 अगस्त, 2017
      Select Dataset
      According to UNICEF report, in 2015, seven out of ten people used a safely managed drinking water service. Universal access to safe drinking water is a fundamental need and human right. Securing access for all would go a long way in reducing illness and death, especially among children. Since 2000, 1.4 billion people have gained access to basic drinking water services, such as piped water into the home or a protected dug well. In 2015, 844 million people still lack a basic water service and among them almost 159 million people still collected drinking water directly from rivers, lakes and other surface water sources. The data reveal pronounced disparities, with the poorest and those living in rural areas least likely to use a basic service. “Safely managed” water services represent an ambitious new rung on the ladder used to track progress on drinking water. In 2015, 5.2 billion people used safely managed services, i.e. accessible on premises, available when needed and free from contamination. A further 1.3 billion used a ‘basic’ water service, i.e. improved sources within 30 minutes per round trip to collect water. Over a quarter of a billion (258 million) used a ‘limited’ service where water collection from an improved source exceeded 30 minutes. In most countries the burden of water collection continues to fall mainly to women and girls.
  • W
    • सितम्बर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 27 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5): 1577-1600. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/    
    • सितम्बर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 27 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5): 1577-1600. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/  
    • सितम्बर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 27 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products, Ecosystems, 15(3): 401–415. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/  
    • सितम्बर 2015
      Source: Water FootPrint Network
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 27 अक्तूबर, 2015
      Select Dataset
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption, Value of Water Research Report Series No.50, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/  
    • अगस्त 2018
      Source: EarthEcho Water Challenge
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 22 अगस्त, 2018
      Select Dataset
      The pH of pure water is 7. In general, water with a pH lower than 7 is considered acidic, and with a pH greater than 7 is considered basic. The normal range for pH in surface water systems is 6.5 to 8.5, and the pH range for groundwater systems is between 6 to 8.5.
    • जुलाई 2017
      Source: World Health Organization
      Uploaded by: Knoema
      Accessed On: 08 फरवरी, 2018
      Select Dataset

हमारी गोपनीयता कथन और कुकी नीति

"हमारी वेबसाइट आपके ऑनलाइन अनुभव को बेहतर बनाने के लिए कुकीज़ का उपयोग करती है। जब आपने यह वेबसाइट लॉन्च की, तो उन्हें आपके कंप्यूटर पर रखा गया था। आप अपने इंटरनेट ब्राउज़र सेटिंग्स के माध्यम से अपनी व्यक्तिगत कुकी सेटिंग्स बदल सकते हैं।"

गोपनीयता नीति